NYSC vs. Ushie Rita Uguamaye: Free Speech or Overreach

NYSC vs. Ushie Rita Uguamaye: Free Speech or Overreach?

The controversy surrounding Ushie Rita Uguamaye, the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member who publicly criticized President Bola Tinubu’s administration, has taken a new turn with human rights activist Omoyele Sowore stepping in to support her.

Sowore, a staunch advocate of free speech, announced that he and a team of attorneys would accompany Uguamaye to the NYSC Local Government Inspector’s office, where she had been summoned over her viral video.

While NYSC officials demanded she take down her post, their handling of the situation raises serious concerns about citizens’ rights, free speech, and the role of government institutions in democratic governance.

---

A Better Approach: How NYSC Officials Should Have Handled the Case

Instead of pressuring Uguamaye to delete her post, NYSC officials should have:

1. Engaged in Constructive Dialogue:
   • Rather than issuing threats or demanding the post’s removal, the NYSC could have invited Uguamaye for a discussion to understand her concerns.
   • This would have shown that the institution values the opinions of corps members and is open to feedback.
2. Acknowledged the Reality of Economic Hardship:
   • Many Nigerians, including youth corps members, are struggling under the rising cost of living, high inflation, and increasing service tariffs.
   • Instead of silencing her, the NYSC could have reassured corps members of their commitment to improving welfare within their limited capacity.
3. Educated Corps Members on Responsible Civic Engagement:
   • The NYSC should have used this opportunity to educate Uguamaye and other corps members on how to express their concerns in a manner that fosters dialogue while still respecting their rights.
   • Public criticism is not a crime, and corps members should not be punished for speaking out on governance issues that affect them.
4. Avoided a Heavy-Handed Response:
   • The act of summoning Uguamaye and attempting to force her to take down her post reinforces fears of state repression.
   • Instead, officials could have issued a public statement addressing corps members’ concerns while also clarifying their stance on free speech within the institution.

---

Did Uguamaye Violate NYSC or Cybercrime Laws?

A careful examination of NYSC regulations and Nigeria’s Cybercrime Act (2015) suggests that Uguamaye’s video does not constitute a crime:

• NYSC Bye-Laws emphasize discipline but do not expressly prohibit criticism of the government.
• Cybercrime Laws address cyberstalking and misinformation, but Uguamaye’s statements fall under free expression rather than falsehood or incitement.

Legal experts have warned that laws like Section 24 of the Cybercrime Act are often misapplied to silence critics, despite the fact that Nigeria’s Constitution (Section 39) guarantees freedom of speech.

---

Why the Nigerian Government Must See Criticism as Feedback, Not an Attack

Silencing citizens who voice concerns about governance is counterproductive and further alienates the government from the people. Constructive criticism helps:

• Expose Policy Failures: Citizens raise legitimate concerns when they experience economic hardship, inflation, or poor governance.
• Improve Governance: Responsive governments use public feedback to adjust policies for the benefit of the people.
• Enhance Democratic Values: Encouraging free speech fosters trust between the government and citizens, reducing tensions and discontent.

With Nigeria currently facing rising fuel prices, a weakened naira, increased electricity and internet tariffs, and high food inflation, it is expected that citizens will voice their frustration. Instead of labeling critics as enemies of the state, the government should address the economic realities driving public discontent.

---

How Can Citizens’ Rights Be Protected?

1. Legal Protections Against Retaliation:
   • Laws must be strengthened to protect whistleblowers and critics from harassment by government agencies.
2. Judicial Oversight on Free Speech Cases:
   • The judiciary must prevent misuse of laws like the Cybercrime Act to suppress dissent.
3. International Advocacy:
   • Organizations like the United Nations, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch should continue to monitor and call out violations of free speech in Nigeria.
4. Public Awareness and Solidarity:
   • Citizens must continue to demand accountability and transparency, ensuring that voices like Uguamaye’s are not silenced.

---

The Controversial Video and Subsequent Threats

Raye’s candid TikTok video lamented the nation’s deteriorating economic conditions and openly criticized President Tinubu’s leadership. Following its virality, she alleged receiving threats, purportedly from NYSC officials, pressuring her to retract her statements. Expressing her concerns, Raye highlighted that these officials possess her personal information, intensifying her fears for safety.

Sowore’s Intervention

On Monday, Sowore shared a video on X (formerly Twitter), revealing his meeting with Raye in Lagos. He announced plans to accompany her to the NYSC Local Government Inspector’s office, alongside a team of attorneys, signaling a robust defense of her rights. This move has amplified attention to Raye’s situation and the broader implications for free speech in Nigeria.

Final Thoughts

The case of Ushie Rita Uguamaye is a litmus test for Nigeria’s democracy. The NYSC’s response could have been an opportunity to foster constructive engagement rather than a heavy-handed crackdown on free speech.

If the government truly wants to gain the trust of its people, it must embrace criticism, address economic hardships, and stop weaponizing institutions against dissenters.

For now, all eyes remain on the NYSC and the Nigerian government to see whether they will uphold democratic principles or further clamp down on free expression.